The Human Gene Editing Debate
John H. Evans
ม.ค. 2022 · Highbridge Audio · บรรยายโดย Victor Bevine
headphones
หนังสือเสียง
5 ชม. 17 นาที
ฉบับสมบูรณ์
family_home
มีสิทธิ์
info
reportคะแนนและรีวิวไม่ได้รับการตรวจสอบยืนยัน ดูข้อมูลเพิ่มเติม
ฟังตัวอย่างระยะเวลา 31 นาที ได้ทุกเมื่อแม้ขณะออฟไลน์
เพิ่ม
เกี่ยวกับหนังสือเสียงเล่มนี้
In 2018 the first genetically modified babies were reportedly born in China, made possible by the invention of CRISPR technology in 2012. This controversial advancement overturned the pre-existing moral consensus, which had held for over fifty years before: while gene editing an adult person was morally acceptable, modifying babies, and thus subsequent generations, crossed a significant moral line. If this line is passed over, scientists will be left without an agreed-upon ethical limit. What do we do now?
John H. Evans here provides a meta-level guide to how these debates move forward and their significance to society. He explains how the bioethical debate has long been characterized as a slippery slope, with consensually ethical use at the top, nightmarish dystopia at the bottom, and specific agreed-upon limits in between, which draw the lines between the ethical and the unethical. Evans frames his analysis around these limits, or barriers. He examines the history of how barriers were placed, then fell, then replaced by new ones, and discusses how these insights inform where the debate may head. He evaluates other proposed barriers relevant to where we are now, projects that most of the barriers suggested by scientists and bioethicists will not hold, and cautiously identifies a few that could serve as the moral boundary for the next generation.
John H. Evans here provides a meta-level guide to how these debates move forward and their significance to society. He explains how the bioethical debate has long been characterized as a slippery slope, with consensually ethical use at the top, nightmarish dystopia at the bottom, and specific agreed-upon limits in between, which draw the lines between the ethical and the unethical. Evans frames his analysis around these limits, or barriers. He examines the history of how barriers were placed, then fell, then replaced by new ones, and discusses how these insights inform where the debate may head. He evaluates other proposed barriers relevant to where we are now, projects that most of the barriers suggested by scientists and bioethicists will not hold, and cautiously identifies a few that could serve as the moral boundary for the next generation.
ให้คะแนนหนังสือเสียงนี้
แสดงความเห็นของคุณให้เรารับรู้
ข้อมูลการฟัง
สมาร์ทโฟนและแท็บเล็ต
ติดตั้งแอป Google Play Books สำหรับ Android และ iPad/iPhone แอปจะซิงค์โดยอัตโนมัติกับบัญชีของคุณ และช่วยให้คุณอ่านแบบออนไลน์หรือออฟไลน์ได้ทุกที่
แล็ปท็อปและคอมพิวเตอร์
คุณสามารถอ่านหนังสือที่ซื้อจาก Google Play โดยใช้เว็บเบราว์เซอร์บนคอมพิวเตอร์ของคุณ
