The Crackdown on Humanitarian Aid in Turkey - Report

Among the numerous cases analyzed, the stories of individuals like Halime Gülsu, Nihat Toktar, Hatice Yıldız, and Halit Dumankaya exemplify the profound personal tragedies behind these statistics. Halime Gülsu, denied essential medical treatment while imprisoned, tragically lost her life, underscoring the dire human cost of these policies. Nihat Toktar, arrested for simply distributing bread to students in need, and Hatice Yıldız, detained for aiding her imprisoned daughter, highlight the indiscriminate targeting of those providing basic humanitarian support. Halit Dumankaya’s case, where a respected business leader was imprisoned for alleged affiliations, further illustrates the scope of the crackdown. These stories, along with hundreds of others not detailed in this report, paint a vivid picture of the widespread human cost of this crackdown. Each narrative underscores the devastating impact of Turkey’s misuse of counterterrorism measures on ordinary lives, compelling an urgent need for a reconsidered approach that respects human rights and the rule of law.

Key Findings:

• Misapplication of Justice: Individuals have been charged under counterterrorism without

concrete evidence, relying heavily on affiliations or baseless accusations.

• Suppression of Philanthropy: Philanthropic activities, especially those directed towards

families affected by government purges, have been criminalized, portraying acts of charity

as terrorism.

• Media and Judicial Bias: There is significant governmental influence on both media and

judiciary, which undermines the objectivity in reporting and adjudicating cases related to the

Gülen Movement.

• Human Rights Violations: The aggressive enforcement of counterterrorism laws has led to

severe human rights violations, including the denial of medical care, inhumane detention5

The Crackdown on Humanitarian Aid in Turkey conditions, and unwarranted seizures of property.

This report calls for international attention and intervention with specific recommendations:

1. Establish independent monitoring bodies to oversee Turkey’s adherence to international

human rights obligations.

2. Urge the Turkish government to revise its counterterrorism laws to ensure they cannot be

misused to target humanitarian actions.

3. Encourage international human rights organizations to increase support for individuals and

families affected by the crackdown in Turkey.

In conclusion, the systematic targeting of individuals under the guise of counterterrorism not only

disrupts lives but also severely impacts Turkey’s legal and social fabric, questioning the integrity

of its commitment to upholding fundamental human rights and freedoms. The global community

must respond, ensuring that humanitarian principles guide our actions and that those facing

persecution are not forgotten. This is essential for upholding the dignity and rights of all individuals

and for maintaining the social cohesion necessary for any functioning democracy.