Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress
2011 ж. мау. · Princeton University Press
Электрондық кітап
376
бет
family_home
Жарамды
info
reportРейтингілер мен пікірлер тексерілмеген. Толығырақ
Осы электрондық кітап туралы ақпарат
From the 1910 overthrow of "Czar" Joseph Cannon to the reforms enacted when Republicans took over the House in 1995, institutional change within the U.S. Congress has been both a product and a shaper of congressional politics. For several decades, scholars have explained this process in terms of a particular collective interest shared by members, be it partisanship, reelection worries, or policy motivations. Eric Schickler makes the case that it is actually interplay among multiple interests that determines institutional change. In the process, he explains how congressional institutions have proved remarkably adaptable and yet consistently frustrating for members and outside observers alike.
Analyzing leadership, committee, and procedural restructuring in four periods (1890-1910, 1919-1932, 1937-1952, and 1970-1989), Schickler argues that coalitions promoting a wide range of member interests drive change in both the House and Senate. He shows that multiple interests determine institutional innovation within a period; that different interests are important in different periods; and, more broadly, that changes in the salient collective interests across time do not follow a simple logical or developmental sequence. Institutional development appears disjointed, as new arrangements are layered on preexisting structures intended to serve competing interests. An epilogue assesses the rise and fall of Newt Gingrich in light of these findings.
Schickler's model of "disjointed pluralism" integrates rational choice theory with historical institutionalist approaches. It both complicates and advances efforts at theoretical synthesis by proposing a fuller, more nuanced understanding of institutional innovation--and thus of American political development and history.
Analyzing leadership, committee, and procedural restructuring in four periods (1890-1910, 1919-1932, 1937-1952, and 1970-1989), Schickler argues that coalitions promoting a wide range of member interests drive change in both the House and Senate. He shows that multiple interests determine institutional innovation within a period; that different interests are important in different periods; and, more broadly, that changes in the salient collective interests across time do not follow a simple logical or developmental sequence. Institutional development appears disjointed, as new arrangements are layered on preexisting structures intended to serve competing interests. An epilogue assesses the rise and fall of Newt Gingrich in light of these findings.
Schickler's model of "disjointed pluralism" integrates rational choice theory with historical institutionalist approaches. It both complicates and advances efforts at theoretical synthesis by proposing a fuller, more nuanced understanding of institutional innovation--and thus of American political development and history.
Авторы туралы
Eric Schickler is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley.
Осы электрондық кітапты бағалаңыз.
Пікіріңізбен бөлісіңіз.
Ақпаратты оқу
Смартфондар мен планшеттер
Android және iPad/iPhone үшін Google Play Books қолданбасын орнатыңыз. Ол аккаунтпен автоматты түрде синхрондалады және қайда болсаңыз да, онлайн не офлайн режимде оқуға мүмкіндік береді.
Ноутбуктар мен компьютерлер
Google Play дүкенінде сатып алған аудиокітаптарды компьютердің браузерінде тыңдауыңызға болады.
eReader және басқа құрылғылар
Kobo eReader сияқты E-ink технологиясымен жұмыс істейтін құрылғылардан оқу үшін файлды жүктеп, оны құрылғыға жіберу керек. Қолдау көрсетілетін eReader құрылғысына файл жіберу үшін Анықтама орталығының нұсқауларын орындаңыз.
