Dracula and Philosophy: Dying to Know
Nicolas Michaud · Janelle Pötzsch
জুল ২০১৫ · Popular Culture and Philosophy বই 90 · Open Court
ই-বুক
288
পৃষ্ঠা
family_home
উপযুক্ত
info
reportরেটিং ও রিভিউ যাচাই করা হয়নি আরও জানুন
এই ই-বুকের বিষয়ে
Twenty-four nocturnal philosophers stake out and vivisect Dracula from many angles, unearthing evidence from numerous movies and shows—macabre, terrifying, tragic, and comic.
Altmann decides whether Dracula can really be blamed for his crimes, since it’s his nature as a vampire to behave a certain way. Arp argues that Dracula’s addiction to live human blood dooms him to perpetual misery. Karavitis sees Dracula as a Randian individual pitted against the Marxist collective. Ketcham contrives a meeting between Dracula and the Jewish theologian Maimonides. Littmann maintains that if we disapprove of Dracula’s behavior, we ought to be vegetarians. Mahon uses the example of Dracula to resolve nagging problems about the desirability of immortality. McCrossin and Wolfe, disinter some of the re-interpretations of this now-mythical character, and asks whether we can identify an essential Dracula. Pramik shows how the Dracula tale embodies Kierkegaard’s three stages of life. Barkman and Versteeg ponder what it would really feel like to be Dracula. The Greens publish some previous unknown letters between Dracula and Camus's Meursault. Vuckovich looks at the sexual morality of characters in the Dracula saga. De Waal explains that "Dragula" is scary because every time this being appears, it causes "gender trouble."
Altmann decides whether Dracula can really be blamed for his crimes, since it’s his nature as a vampire to behave a certain way. Arp argues that Dracula’s addiction to live human blood dooms him to perpetual misery. Karavitis sees Dracula as a Randian individual pitted against the Marxist collective. Ketcham contrives a meeting between Dracula and the Jewish theologian Maimonides. Littmann maintains that if we disapprove of Dracula’s behavior, we ought to be vegetarians. Mahon uses the example of Dracula to resolve nagging problems about the desirability of immortality. McCrossin and Wolfe, disinter some of the re-interpretations of this now-mythical character, and asks whether we can identify an essential Dracula. Pramik shows how the Dracula tale embodies Kierkegaard’s three stages of life. Barkman and Versteeg ponder what it would really feel like to be Dracula. The Greens publish some previous unknown letters between Dracula and Camus's Meursault. Vuckovich looks at the sexual morality of characters in the Dracula saga. De Waal explains that "Dragula" is scary because every time this being appears, it causes "gender trouble."
লেখক সম্পর্কে
Nicolas Michaud: Nicolas Michaud is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Florida State College Jacksonville. He is the editor of Jurassic Park and Philosophy (2014), Frankenstein and Philosophy (2013), and Hunger Games and Philosophy (2012). Dr. Michaud regularly appears on WJCT Jacksonville radio discussing film and philosophy.
Janelle Pötzsch: Dr. Janelle Pötzsch holds a doctorate in philosophy from Ruhr-Universität Bochum and currently works as a research assistant at the Institut für Philosophie.
Janelle Pötzsch: Dr. Janelle Pötzsch holds a doctorate in philosophy from Ruhr-Universität Bochum and currently works as a research assistant at the Institut für Philosophie.
ই-বুকে রেটিং দিন
আপনার মতামত জানান।
পঠন তথ্য
স্মার্টফোন এবং ট্যাবলেট
Android এবং iPad/iPhone এর জন্য Google Play বই অ্যাপ ইনস্টল করুন। এটি আপনার অ্যাকাউন্টের সাথে অটোমেটিক সিঙ্ক হয় ও আপনি অনলাইন বা অফলাইন যাই থাকুন না কেন আপনাকে পড়তে দেয়।
ল্যাপটপ ও কম্পিউটার
Google Play থেকে কেনা অডিওবুক আপনি কম্পিউটারের ওয়েব ব্রাউজারে শুনতে পারেন।
eReader এবং অন্যান্য ডিভাইস
Kobo eReaders-এর মতো e-ink ডিভাইসে পড়তে, আপনাকে একটি ফাইল ডাউনলোড ও আপনার ডিভাইসে ট্রান্সফার করতে হবে। ব্যবহারকারীর উদ্দেশ্যে তৈরি সহায়তা কেন্দ্রতে দেওয়া নির্দেশাবলী অনুসরণ করে যেসব eReader-এ ফাইল পড়া যাবে সেখানে ট্রান্সফার করুন।
