Dracula and Philosophy: Dying to Know
Nicolas Michaud · Janelle Pötzsch
ਜੁਲਾ 2015 · Popular Culture and Philosophy ਕਿਤਾਬ 90 · Open Court
ਈ-ਕਿਤਾਬ
288
ਪੰਨੇ
family_home
ਯੋਗ
info
reportਰੇਟਿੰਗਾਂ ਅਤੇ ਸਮੀਖਿਆਵਾਂ ਦੀ ਪੁਸ਼ਟੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਕੀਤੀ ਗਈ ਹੈ ਹੋਰ ਜਾਣੋ
ਇਸ ਈ-ਕਿਤਾਬ ਬਾਰੇ
Twenty-four nocturnal philosophers stake out and vivisect Dracula from many angles, unearthing evidence from numerous movies and shows—macabre, terrifying, tragic, and comic.
Altmann decides whether Dracula can really be blamed for his crimes, since it’s his nature as a vampire to behave a certain way. Arp argues that Dracula’s addiction to live human blood dooms him to perpetual misery. Karavitis sees Dracula as a Randian individual pitted against the Marxist collective. Ketcham contrives a meeting between Dracula and the Jewish theologian Maimonides. Littmann maintains that if we disapprove of Dracula’s behavior, we ought to be vegetarians. Mahon uses the example of Dracula to resolve nagging problems about the desirability of immortality. McCrossin and Wolfe, disinter some of the re-interpretations of this now-mythical character, and asks whether we can identify an essential Dracula. Pramik shows how the Dracula tale embodies Kierkegaard’s three stages of life. Barkman and Versteeg ponder what it would really feel like to be Dracula. The Greens publish some previous unknown letters between Dracula and Camus's Meursault. Vuckovich looks at the sexual morality of characters in the Dracula saga. De Waal explains that "Dragula" is scary because every time this being appears, it causes "gender trouble."
Altmann decides whether Dracula can really be blamed for his crimes, since it’s his nature as a vampire to behave a certain way. Arp argues that Dracula’s addiction to live human blood dooms him to perpetual misery. Karavitis sees Dracula as a Randian individual pitted against the Marxist collective. Ketcham contrives a meeting between Dracula and the Jewish theologian Maimonides. Littmann maintains that if we disapprove of Dracula’s behavior, we ought to be vegetarians. Mahon uses the example of Dracula to resolve nagging problems about the desirability of immortality. McCrossin and Wolfe, disinter some of the re-interpretations of this now-mythical character, and asks whether we can identify an essential Dracula. Pramik shows how the Dracula tale embodies Kierkegaard’s three stages of life. Barkman and Versteeg ponder what it would really feel like to be Dracula. The Greens publish some previous unknown letters between Dracula and Camus's Meursault. Vuckovich looks at the sexual morality of characters in the Dracula saga. De Waal explains that "Dragula" is scary because every time this being appears, it causes "gender trouble."
ਲੇਖਕ ਬਾਰੇ
Nicolas Michaud: Nicolas Michaud is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Florida State College Jacksonville. He is the editor of Jurassic Park and Philosophy (2014), Frankenstein and Philosophy (2013), and Hunger Games and Philosophy (2012). Dr. Michaud regularly appears on WJCT Jacksonville radio discussing film and philosophy.
Janelle Pötzsch: Dr. Janelle Pötzsch holds a doctorate in philosophy from Ruhr-Universität Bochum and currently works as a research assistant at the Institut für Philosophie.
Janelle Pötzsch: Dr. Janelle Pötzsch holds a doctorate in philosophy from Ruhr-Universität Bochum and currently works as a research assistant at the Institut für Philosophie.
ਇਸ ਈ-ਕਿਤਾਬ ਨੂੰ ਰੇਟ ਕਰੋ
ਆਪਣੇ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਦੱਸੋ
ਪੜ੍ਹਨ ਸੰਬੰਧੀ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ
ਸਮਾਰਟਫ਼ੋਨ ਅਤੇ ਟੈਬਲੈੱਟ
Google Play Books ਐਪ ਨੂੰ Android ਅਤੇ iPad/iPhone ਲਈ ਸਥਾਪਤ ਕਰੋ। ਇਹ ਤੁਹਾਡੇ ਖਾਤੇ ਨਾਲ ਸਵੈਚਲਿਤ ਤੌਰ 'ਤੇ ਸਿੰਕ ਕਰਦੀ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ ਕਿਤੋਂ ਵੀ ਆਨਲਾਈਨ ਜਾਂ ਆਫ਼ਲਾਈਨ ਪੜ੍ਹਨ ਦਿੰਦੀ ਹੈ।
ਲੈਪਟਾਪ ਅਤੇ ਕੰਪਿਊਟਰ
ਤੁਸੀਂ ਆਪਣੇ ਕੰਪਿਊਟਰ ਦਾ ਵੈੱਬ ਬ੍ਰਾਊਜ਼ਰ ਵਰਤਦੇ ਹੋਏ Google Play 'ਤੇ ਖਰੀਦੀਆਂ ਗਈਆਂ ਆਡੀਓ-ਕਿਤਾਬਾਂ ਸੁਣ ਸਕਦੇ ਹੋ।
eReaders ਅਤੇ ਹੋਰ ਡੀਵਾਈਸਾਂ
e-ink ਡੀਵਾਈਸਾਂ 'ਤੇ ਪੜ੍ਹਨ ਲਈ ਜਿਵੇਂ Kobo eReaders, ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ ਫ਼ਾਈਲ ਡਾਊਨਲੋਡ ਕਰਨ ਅਤੇ ਇਸਨੂੰ ਆਪਣੇ ਡੀਵਾਈਸ 'ਤੇ ਟ੍ਰਾਂਸਫਰ ਕਰਨ ਦੀ ਲੋੜ ਹੋਵੇਗੀ। ਸਮਰਥਿਤ eReaders 'ਤੇ ਫ਼ਾਈਲਾਂ ਟ੍ਰਾਂਸਫਰ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ ਵੇਰਵੇ ਸਹਿਤ ਮਦਦ ਕੇਂਦਰ ਹਿਦਾਇਤਾਂ ਦੀ ਪਾਲਣਾ ਕਰੋ।
