Dracula and Philosophy: Dying to Know
Nicolas Michaud · Janelle Pötzsch
2015 ජූලි · Popular Culture and Philosophy පොත 90 · Open Court
ඉ-පොත
288
පිටු
family_home
සුදුසුකම් ලබයි
info
reportඇගයීම් සහ සමාලෝචන සත්‍යාපනය කර නැත වැඩිදුර දැන ගන්න
මෙම ඉ-පොත ගැන
Twenty-four nocturnal philosophers stake out and vivisect Dracula from many angles, unearthing evidence from numerous movies and shows—macabre, terrifying, tragic, and comic.
Altmann decides whether Dracula can really be blamed for his crimes, since it’s his nature as a vampire to behave a certain way. Arp argues that Dracula’s addiction to live human blood dooms him to perpetual misery. Karavitis sees Dracula as a Randian individual pitted against the Marxist collective. Ketcham contrives a meeting between Dracula and the Jewish theologian Maimonides. Littmann maintains that if we disapprove of Dracula’s behavior, we ought to be vegetarians. Mahon uses the example of Dracula to resolve nagging problems about the desirability of immortality. McCrossin and Wolfe, disinter some of the re-interpretations of this now-mythical character, and asks whether we can identify an essential Dracula. Pramik shows how the Dracula tale embodies Kierkegaard’s three stages of life. Barkman and Versteeg ponder what it would really feel like to be Dracula. The Greens publish some previous unknown letters between Dracula and Camus's Meursault. Vuckovich looks at the sexual morality of characters in the Dracula saga. De Waal explains that "Dragula" is scary because every time this being appears, it causes "gender trouble."
Altmann decides whether Dracula can really be blamed for his crimes, since it’s his nature as a vampire to behave a certain way. Arp argues that Dracula’s addiction to live human blood dooms him to perpetual misery. Karavitis sees Dracula as a Randian individual pitted against the Marxist collective. Ketcham contrives a meeting between Dracula and the Jewish theologian Maimonides. Littmann maintains that if we disapprove of Dracula’s behavior, we ought to be vegetarians. Mahon uses the example of Dracula to resolve nagging problems about the desirability of immortality. McCrossin and Wolfe, disinter some of the re-interpretations of this now-mythical character, and asks whether we can identify an essential Dracula. Pramik shows how the Dracula tale embodies Kierkegaard’s three stages of life. Barkman and Versteeg ponder what it would really feel like to be Dracula. The Greens publish some previous unknown letters between Dracula and Camus's Meursault. Vuckovich looks at the sexual morality of characters in the Dracula saga. De Waal explains that "Dragula" is scary because every time this being appears, it causes "gender trouble."
කර්තෘ පිළිබඳ
Nicolas Michaud: Nicolas Michaud is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Florida State College Jacksonville. He is the editor of Jurassic Park and Philosophy (2014), Frankenstein and Philosophy (2013), and Hunger Games and Philosophy (2012). Dr. Michaud regularly appears on WJCT Jacksonville radio discussing film and philosophy.
Janelle Pötzsch: Dr. Janelle Pötzsch holds a doctorate in philosophy from Ruhr-Universität Bochum and currently works as a research assistant at the Institut für Philosophie.
Janelle Pötzsch: Dr. Janelle Pötzsch holds a doctorate in philosophy from Ruhr-Universität Bochum and currently works as a research assistant at the Institut für Philosophie.
මෙම ඉ-පොත අගයන්න
ඔබ සිතන දෙය අපට කියන්න.
කියවීමේ තොරතුරු
ස්මාර්ට් දුරකථන සහ ටැබ්ලට්
Android සහ iPad/iPhone සඳහා Google Play පොත් යෙදුම ස්ථාපනය කරන්න. එය ඔබේ ගිණුම සමඟ ස්වයංක්‍රීයව සමමුහුර්ත කරන අතර ඔබට ඕනෑම තැනක සිට සබැඳිව හෝ නොබැඳිව කියවීමට ඉඩ සලසයි.
ලැප්ටොප් සහ පරිගණක
ඔබට ඔබේ පරිගණකයේ වෙබ් බ්‍රව්සරය භාවිතයෙන් Google Play මත මිලදී ගත් ශ්‍රව්‍යපොත්වලට සවන් දිය හැක.
eReaders සහ වෙනත් උපාංග
Kobo eReaders වැනි e-ink උපාංග පිළිබඳ කියවීමට, ඔබ විසින් ගොනුවක් බාගෙන ඔබේ උපාංගයට එය මාරු කිරීම සිදු කළ යුතු වේ. ආධාරකරු ඉ-කියවනයට ගොනු මාරු කිරීමට විස්තරාත්මක උදවු මධ්‍යස්ථාන උපදෙස් අනුගමනය කරන්න.
