Nāifah Rāhmāan
Pride,you sound ridiculous! This book is horrible! That's all we need is more hate books with so much deceit. Write something with meaning and good for all people,GOD didn't create just one race of people. If people wanna learn ignorance at its best,just read the free copy of this crappy chatter. And save yourself with the liberal speech,I'm a human being that believes in change & equality as all should do. If you don't and living your life in traditonalism,then keep living ignorant and leave the rest alone. The world was built spacious! You can always gather your hate and foolishness and sail back to europe. And NO! I didn't give you that star,Google gave you that one...
2 people found this review helpful
A Google user
The book was good. Much like his radio show, he will build up a point before he makes it and sometimes it falls flat either by information being common knowledge or the point being based on conjecture upon multiple sources of information. That being said, if everything in this book was common knowledge we would have a different president by this time next year, if not already.
Mike C
The author's call to arms is about as mistaken as the extremes of the left and right ends of the political spectrum. The free market is a misunderstood economic concept that rarely exists in the wild because the conditions necessary for a free market don't exist. Sme wealthy eonomies attempt to measure Gross Domestic Happiness; a worthy but impossible concept. It's worth is to acknowledge that societies with vast disparities between wealth become unstable. The author demonstrates a political concept of social 'good' that isuninformed by evolving economic principles ad theories. If you are looking for a measured policy and economic analysis, look elsewhere. The author is substituting his obvious political beliefs for any well defined basic macroeconomic and social and political science theories taught to first year undergraduate class. This book is biased and likely to appeal to others with similar political affinities. This was a missed opportunity to compare and contrast policies within the American context.
1 person found this review helpful