Payment modality preferences: Evidence from Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Programme

·
· ESSP Working Paper መጽሐፍ 125 · Intl Food Policy Res Inst
5.0
1 ግምገማ
ኢ-መጽሐፍ
25
ገጾች
ብቁ
የተሰጡት ደረጃዎች እና ግምገማዎች የተረጋገጡ አይደሉም  የበለጠ ለመረዳት

ስለዚህ ኢ-መጽሐፍ

Economists typically default to the assumption that cash is always preferable to an in-kind transfer. We extend the classic Southworth (1945) framework to predict under what conditions this assumption holds. We take the model to longitudinal household data from Ethiopia where a large-scale social safety net intervention – the Productive Safety Net Programme (PSNP) – operates. Even though most PSNP payments are paid in cash, and even though the (temporal) transaction costs associated with food payments are higher than payments received as cash, the overwhelming majority of the beneficiary households prefer their payments only or partly in food. However, these preferences are neither homogeneous nor stable. Higher food prices induce shifts in preferences towards in-kind transfers, but more food secure households and those closer to food markets and to financial services prefer cash. There is suggestive evidence that preferences for food are also driven by self-control concerns.

ደረጃዎች እና ግምገማዎች

5.0
1 ግምገማ

ለዚህ ኢ-መጽሐፍ ደረጃ ይስጡ

ምን እንደሚያስቡ ይንገሩን።

የንባብ መረጃ

ዘመናዊ ስልኮች እና ጡባዊዎች
የGoogle Play መጽሐፍት መተግበሪያውንAndroid እና iPad/iPhone ያውርዱ። ከእርስዎ መለያ ጋር በራስሰር ይመሳሰላል እና ባሉበት የትም ቦታ በመስመር ላይ እና ከመስመር ውጭ እንዲያነቡ ያስችልዎታል።
ላፕቶፖች እና ኮምፒውተሮች
የኮምፒውተርዎን ድር አሳሽ ተጠቅመው በGoogle Play ላይ የተገዙ ኦዲዮ መጽሐፍትን ማዳመጥ ይችላሉ።
ኢሪደሮች እና ሌሎች መሳሪያዎች
እንደ Kobo ኢ-አንባቢዎች ባሉ ኢ-ቀለም መሣሪያዎች ላይ ለማንበብ ፋይል አውርደው ወደ መሣሪያዎ ማስተላለፍ ይኖርብዎታል። ፋይሎቹን ወደሚደገፉ ኢ-አንባቢዎች ለማስተላለፍ ዝርዝር የእገዛ ማዕከል መመሪያዎቹን ይከተሉ።