An often cited type of example is тАЬThe [relative of his] [which every man admires most] is his mother.тАЭ, where the pronoun тАЬhisтАЭ in the relative head appears to be bound by the quantified noun phrase тАЬevery manтАЭ in the relative clause тАУ although the latter does not c-command the former, which is commonly required for binding.
Several solutions have been developed in various theoretical frameworks. One interesting aspect about reconstruction effects in relative clauses is that they can be used as a benchmark for competing theories of grammar: Which architecture of the syntax-semantics interface can provide the most satisfying explanation for these phenomena? This volume brings together researchers working in different frameworks but looking at the same set of empirical facts, enabling the reader to develop their own perspective on the perfect tradeoff between syntax and semantics in a theory of grammar.
Manfred Krifka, Humboldt University of Berlin & ZAS, Berlin; Mathias Schenner, ZAS, Berlin.