Risk Regulation and Administrative Constitutionalism

¡ Bloomsbury Publishing
ā§Ģ.ā§Ļ
ā§§ āĻŸāĻž āĻĒā§°ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ˛ā§‹āĻšāĻ¨āĻž
āĻ‡āĻŦā§āĻ•
256
āĻĒā§ƒāĻˇā§āĻ āĻž
āĻŽā§‚āĻ˛ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ‚āĻ•āĻ¨ āĻ†ā§°ā§ āĻĒā§°ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ˛ā§‹āĻšāĻ¨āĻž āĻ¸āĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻĒāĻ¨ āĻ•ā§°āĻž āĻšā§‹ā§ąāĻž āĻ¨āĻžāĻ‡  āĻ…āĻ§āĻŋāĻ• āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻ•

āĻāĻ‡ āĻ‡āĻŦā§āĻ•āĻ–āĻ¨ā§° āĻŦāĻŋāĻˇā§Ÿā§‡

Over the last decade the regulatory evaluation of environmental and public health risks has been one of the most legally controversial areas of contemporary government activity. Much of that debate has been understood as a conflict between those promoting 'scientific' approaches to risk evaluation and those promoting 'democratic' approaches. This characterization of disputes has ignored the central roles of public administration and law in technological risk evaluation. This is problematic because, as shown in this book, legal disputes over risk evaluation are disputes over administrative constitutionalism in that they are disputes over what role law should play in constituting and limiting the power of administrative risk regulators. This is shown by five case studies taken from five different legal cultures: an analysis of the bifurcated role of the Southwood Working Party in the UK BSE crisis; the development of doctrines in relation to judicial review of risk evaluation in the US in the 1970s; the interpretation of the precautionary principle by environmental courts and generalist tribunals carrying out merits review in Australia; the interpretation of the WTO Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement as part of the WTO dispute settlement process; and the interpretation of the precautionary principle in the EU context. A strong argument is thus made for re-orienting the focus of scholarship in this area.

āĻŽā§‚āĻ˛ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ‚āĻ•āĻ¨ āĻ†ā§°ā§ āĻĒā§°ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ˛ā§‹āĻšāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¸āĻŽā§‚āĻš

ā§Ģ.ā§Ļ
ā§§ āĻŸāĻž āĻĒā§°ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ˛ā§‹āĻšāĻ¨āĻž

āĻ˛āĻŋāĻ–āĻ•ā§° āĻŦāĻŋāĻˇāĻ¯āĻŧā§‡

Elizabeth Fisher is a Reader in Environmental Law at the University of Oxford and Tutor in Law at Corpus Christi College, Oxford.

āĻāĻ‡ āĻ‡āĻŦā§āĻ•āĻ–āĻ¨āĻ• āĻŽā§‚āĻ˛ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ‚āĻ•āĻ¨ āĻ•ā§°āĻ•

āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻ• āĻ†āĻĒā§‹āĻ¨āĻžā§° āĻŽāĻ¤āĻžāĻŽāĻ¤ āĻœāĻ¨āĻžāĻ“āĻ•āĨ¤

āĻĒāĻĸāĻŧāĻžā§° āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻĻā§‡āĻļāĻžā§ąāĻ˛ā§€

āĻ¸ā§āĻŽāĻžā§°ā§āĻŸāĻĢ’āĻ¨ āĻ†ā§°ā§ āĻŸā§‡āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻŸ
Android āĻ†ā§°ā§ iPad/iPhoneā§° āĻŦāĻžāĻŦā§‡ Google Play Books āĻāĻĒāĻŸā§‹ āĻ‡āĻ¨āĻˇā§āĻŸāĻ˛ āĻ•ā§°āĻ•āĨ¤ āĻ‡ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻ¯āĻŧāĻ‚āĻ•ā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ¯āĻŧāĻ­āĻžā§ąā§‡ āĻ†āĻĒā§‹āĻ¨āĻžā§° āĻāĻ•āĻžāĻ‰āĻŖā§āĻŸā§° āĻ¸ā§ˆāĻ¤ā§‡ āĻ›āĻŋāĻ‚āĻ• āĻšāĻ¯āĻŧ āĻ†ā§°ā§ āĻ†āĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ¯'āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻ¨āĻžāĻĨāĻžāĻ•āĻ• āĻ¤'āĻ¤ā§‡āĻ‡ āĻ•ā§‹āĻ¨ā§‹ āĻ…āĻĄāĻŋāĻ…'āĻŦā§āĻ• āĻ…āĻ¨āĻ˛āĻžāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻŦāĻž āĻ…āĻĢāĻ˛āĻžāĻ‡āĻ¨āĻ¤ āĻļā§āĻ¨āĻŋāĻŦāĻ˛ā§ˆ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻŋāĻ§āĻž āĻĻāĻŋāĻ¯āĻŧā§‡āĨ¤
āĻ˛ā§‡āĻĒāĻŸāĻĒ āĻ†ā§°ā§ āĻ•āĻŽā§āĻĒāĻŋāĻ‰āĻŸāĻžā§°
āĻ†āĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ•āĻŽā§āĻĒāĻŋāĻ‰āĻŸāĻžā§°ā§° ā§ąā§‡āĻŦ āĻŦā§āĻ°āĻžāĻ‰āĻœāĻžā§° āĻŦā§āĻ¯ā§ąāĻšāĻžā§° āĻ•ā§°āĻŋ Google PlayāĻ¤ āĻ•āĻŋāĻ¨āĻž āĻ…āĻĄāĻŋāĻ…'āĻŦā§āĻ•āĻ¸āĻŽā§‚āĻš āĻļā§āĻ¨āĻŋāĻŦ āĻĒāĻžā§°ā§‡āĨ¤
āĻ‡-ā§°ā§€āĻĄāĻžā§° āĻ†ā§°ā§ āĻ…āĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻĄāĻŋāĻ­āĻžāĻ‡āĻš
Kobo eReadersā§° āĻĻā§°ā§‡ āĻ‡-āĻšāĻŋā§ŸāĻžāĻāĻšā§€ā§° āĻĄāĻŋāĻ­āĻžāĻ‡āĻšāĻ¸āĻŽā§‚āĻšāĻ¤ āĻĒā§āĻŋāĻŦāĻ˛ā§ˆ, āĻ†āĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻŋ āĻāĻŸāĻž āĻĢāĻžāĻ‡āĻ˛ āĻĄāĻžāĻ‰āĻ¨āĻ˛â€™āĻĄ āĻ•ā§°āĻŋ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ‡āĻŸā§‹ āĻ†āĻĒā§‹āĻ¨āĻžā§° āĻĄāĻŋāĻ­āĻžāĻ‡āĻšāĻ˛ā§ˆ āĻ¸ā§āĻĨāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§°āĻŖ āĻ•ā§°āĻŋāĻŦ āĻ˛āĻžāĻ—āĻŋāĻŦāĨ¤ āĻ¸āĻŽā§°ā§āĻĨāĻŋāĻ¤ āĻ‡-ā§°āĻŋāĻĄāĻžā§°āĻ˛ā§ˆ āĻĢāĻžāĻ‡āĻ˛āĻŸā§‹ āĻ•ā§‡āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ•ā§ˆ āĻ¸ā§āĻĨāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§° āĻ•ā§°āĻŋāĻŦ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻŋāĻŦāĻ˛ā§ˆ āĻ¸āĻšāĻžāĻ¯āĻŧ āĻ•ā§‡āĻ¨ā§āĻĻā§ā§°āĻ¤ āĻĨāĻ•āĻž āĻ¸āĻŦāĻŋāĻļā§‡āĻˇ āĻ¨āĻŋā§°ā§āĻĻā§‡āĻļāĻžā§ąāĻ˛ā§€ āĻšāĻžāĻ“āĻ•āĨ¤