The Structure of Policy Change
2018 ж. сәу. · University of Chicago Press
Электрондық кітап
208
бет
family_home
Жарамды
info
reportРейтингілер мен пікірлер тексерілмеген. Толығырақ
Осы электрондық кітап туралы ақпарат
When the Soviet Union launched Sputnik, the Red Scare seized the American public. While President Eisenhower cautioned restraint, his hand was forced, and NASA’s budget had increased five thousand percent over its pre-Sputnik levels by the time President Kennedy proposed landing a man on the moon. Spending on the space race is in no way unique; Almost every policy area has its own Sputnik-type story, where waves of popular support for an idea (or disillusionment with a previous one) created new political priorities, resulting in dramatic changes to the budget or compelling agencies to respond quickly with little knowledge or preparation. Is this instability an inherent feature of the policy process, or is it possible for an agency to deal with problems in a way that insulates it from swings in public opinion and thus imposes some stability on the decision making process?
Derek A. Epp argues that some agencies can indeed do that and that instability is at least partially a function of poor institutional design. While it is inherently more challenging to maintain stability around complex problems like immigration or climate change, the deliberative process itself can affect the degree of stability around an issue. Epp looks at whether agencies follow a deliberative model for decision making, in which policies are developed by means of debate among a small group of policymakers, or a collective model, in which the opinions of many people are aggregated, as with the stock market. He argues that, in many instances, the collective model produces more informed and stable policy outcomes that can be adapted more readily to new information and changing public priorities.
Derek A. Epp argues that some agencies can indeed do that and that instability is at least partially a function of poor institutional design. While it is inherently more challenging to maintain stability around complex problems like immigration or climate change, the deliberative process itself can affect the degree of stability around an issue. Epp looks at whether agencies follow a deliberative model for decision making, in which policies are developed by means of debate among a small group of policymakers, or a collective model, in which the opinions of many people are aggregated, as with the stock market. He argues that, in many instances, the collective model produces more informed and stable policy outcomes that can be adapted more readily to new information and changing public priorities.
Авторы туралы
Derek A. Epp is assistant professor of political science in the Department of Government at the University of Texas at Austin.
Осы электрондық кітапты бағалаңыз.
Пікіріңізбен бөлісіңіз.
Ақпаратты оқу
Смартфондар мен планшеттер
Android және iPad/iPhone үшін Google Play Books қолданбасын орнатыңыз. Ол аккаунтпен автоматты түрде синхрондалады және қайда болсаңыз да, онлайн не офлайн режимде оқуға мүмкіндік береді.
Ноутбуктар мен компьютерлер
Google Play дүкенінде сатып алған аудиокітаптарды компьютердің браузерінде тыңдауыңызға болады.
eReader және басқа құрылғылар
Kobo eReader сияқты E-ink технологиясымен жұмыс істейтін құрылғылардан оқу үшін файлды жүктеп, оны құрылғыға жіберу керек. Қолдау көрсетілетін eReader құрылғысына файл жіберу үшін Анықтама орталығының нұсқауларын орындаңыз.
