The Structure of Policy Change
เม.ย. 2018 · University of Chicago Press
eBook
208
หน้า
family_home
มีสิทธิ์
info
reportคะแนนและรีวิวไม่ได้รับการตรวจสอบยืนยัน ดูข้อมูลเพิ่มเติม
เกี่ยวกับ eBook เล่มนี้
When the Soviet Union launched Sputnik, the Red Scare seized the American public. While President Eisenhower cautioned restraint, his hand was forced, and NASA’s budget had increased five thousand percent over its pre-Sputnik levels by the time President Kennedy proposed landing a man on the moon. Spending on the space race is in no way unique; Almost every policy area has its own Sputnik-type story, where waves of popular support for an idea (or disillusionment with a previous one) created new political priorities, resulting in dramatic changes to the budget or compelling agencies to respond quickly with little knowledge or preparation. Is this instability an inherent feature of the policy process, or is it possible for an agency to deal with problems in a way that insulates it from swings in public opinion and thus imposes some stability on the decision making process?
Derek A. Epp argues that some agencies can indeed do that and that instability is at least partially a function of poor institutional design. While it is inherently more challenging to maintain stability around complex problems like immigration or climate change, the deliberative process itself can affect the degree of stability around an issue. Epp looks at whether agencies follow a deliberative model for decision making, in which policies are developed by means of debate among a small group of policymakers, or a collective model, in which the opinions of many people are aggregated, as with the stock market. He argues that, in many instances, the collective model produces more informed and stable policy outcomes that can be adapted more readily to new information and changing public priorities.
Derek A. Epp argues that some agencies can indeed do that and that instability is at least partially a function of poor institutional design. While it is inherently more challenging to maintain stability around complex problems like immigration or climate change, the deliberative process itself can affect the degree of stability around an issue. Epp looks at whether agencies follow a deliberative model for decision making, in which policies are developed by means of debate among a small group of policymakers, or a collective model, in which the opinions of many people are aggregated, as with the stock market. He argues that, in many instances, the collective model produces more informed and stable policy outcomes that can be adapted more readily to new information and changing public priorities.
เกี่ยวกับผู้แต่ง
Derek A. Epp is assistant professor of political science in the Department of Government at the University of Texas at Austin.
ให้คะแนน eBook นี้
แสดงความเห็นของคุณให้เรารับรู้
ข้อมูลในการอ่าน
สมาร์ทโฟนและแท็บเล็ต
ติดตั้งแอป Google Play Books สำหรับ Android และ iPad/iPhone แอปจะซิงค์โดยอัตโนมัติกับบัญชีของคุณ และช่วยให้คุณอ่านแบบออนไลน์หรือออฟไลน์ได้ทุกที่
แล็ปท็อปและคอมพิวเตอร์
คุณฟังหนังสือเสียงที่ซื้อจาก Google Play โดยใช้เว็บเบราว์เซอร์ในคอมพิวเตอร์ได้
eReader และอุปกรณ์อื่นๆ
หากต้องการอ่านบนอุปกรณ์ e-ink เช่น Kobo eReader คุณจะต้องดาวน์โหลดและโอนไฟล์ไปยังอุปกรณ์ของคุณ โปรดทำตามวิธีการอย่างละเอียดในศูนย์ช่วยเหลือเพื่อโอนไฟล์ไปยัง eReader ที่รองรับ
