The Structure of Policy Change
apr, 2018 · University of Chicago Press
E-kitob
208
Sahifalar soni
family_home
Yaroqli
info
reportReytinglar va sharhlar tasdiqlanmagan Batafsil
Bu e-kitob haqida
When the Soviet Union launched Sputnik, the Red Scare seized the American public. While President Eisenhower cautioned restraint, his hand was forced, and NASA’s budget had increased five thousand percent over its pre-Sputnik levels by the time President Kennedy proposed landing a man on the moon. Spending on the space race is in no way unique; Almost every policy area has its own Sputnik-type story, where waves of popular support for an idea (or disillusionment with a previous one) created new political priorities, resulting in dramatic changes to the budget or compelling agencies to respond quickly with little knowledge or preparation. Is this instability an inherent feature of the policy process, or is it possible for an agency to deal with problems in a way that insulates it from swings in public opinion and thus imposes some stability on the decision making process?
Derek A. Epp argues that some agencies can indeed do that and that instability is at least partially a function of poor institutional design. While it is inherently more challenging to maintain stability around complex problems like immigration or climate change, the deliberative process itself can affect the degree of stability around an issue. Epp looks at whether agencies follow a deliberative model for decision making, in which policies are developed by means of debate among a small group of policymakers, or a collective model, in which the opinions of many people are aggregated, as with the stock market. He argues that, in many instances, the collective model produces more informed and stable policy outcomes that can be adapted more readily to new information and changing public priorities.
Derek A. Epp argues that some agencies can indeed do that and that instability is at least partially a function of poor institutional design. While it is inherently more challenging to maintain stability around complex problems like immigration or climate change, the deliberative process itself can affect the degree of stability around an issue. Epp looks at whether agencies follow a deliberative model for decision making, in which policies are developed by means of debate among a small group of policymakers, or a collective model, in which the opinions of many people are aggregated, as with the stock market. He argues that, in many instances, the collective model produces more informed and stable policy outcomes that can be adapted more readily to new information and changing public priorities.
Muallif haqida
Derek A. Epp is assistant professor of political science in the Department of Government at the University of Texas at Austin.
Bu e-kitobni baholang
Fikringizni bildiring.
Qayerda o‘qiladi
Smartfonlar va planshetlar
Android va iPad/iPhone uchun mo‘ljallangan Google Play Kitoblar ilovasini o‘rnating. U hisobingiz bilan avtomatik tazrda sinxronlanadi va hatto oflayn rejimda ham kitob o‘qish imkonini beradi.
Noutbuklar va kompyuterlar
Google Play orqali sotib olingan audiokitoblarni brauzer yordamida tinglash mumkin.
Kitob o‘qish uchun mo‘ljallangan qurilmalar
Kitoblarni Kobo e-riderlar kabi e-siyoh qurilmalarida oʻqish uchun faylni yuklab olish va qurilmaga koʻchirish kerak. Fayllarni e-riderlarga koʻchirish haqida batafsil axborotni Yordam markazidan olishingiz mumkin.
