David Garland
It's been two days since I finished the book and I still think the author got it wrong with his explanation on what happened that night. I think he disregarded the photo of the blurred white light too easily and the cut in the tent from the inside is the big one from me. These were professional hikers and they were in -25 degree temperatures. There is no way in the world they were cutting a hole in their tent unless someone or something was trying to get into that tent..
22 people found this review helpful
jeffery nordgulen
If you are a mystery fan, a scientist, or outdoor adventurer this is a book for you. Though short I found it very compelling, and could not stop reading it. I believe the author has made a very accurate account, managed to navigate a torrid of useless and crazy theories, and come up with the most plausible hypothesis I have ever heard. I really suggest that one should first spend some time reading or checking You Tube to really get the most out of this. The book will not be the same without the mystery swirling in your sub-concinous
24 people found this review helpful
Traveler 267
The author has done extensive research, but his conclusion fails on three points. His conclusion cannot explain why there were crushed ribs/skulls of the victims without any external injuries, the issue of the missing tongue and why there was an orange glow coming off the victims bodies at the funeral. Also there were insufficient number of picture plates in the book. Expected more from the book.
20 people found this review helpful